Citizens for Safe Technology
Empowering the public to protect children
and nature from unsafe wireless technologies.
Alerts and Updates
We send a newsletter on a regular basis to the people on our mailing list. If you wish to receive these short updates, please contact us via our contact link and you will be added to our list.
The same information will also be found here, but in a slightly different format.
To streamline your search, anywhere on the website, for a specific topic, word or phrase, please use the white search bar located under the Action Kits below.
Looking for a specific topic or a past article? Search for it below:
Ronald M. Powell, Ph.D.
Attached is a short paper prepared by Ronald M. Powell Ph.D., a scientist in the US who distributed it to the 24 superintendents of public schools in Maryland outlining the dangers of wireless devices in schools. A second, similar version was distributed to the 24 directors of public libraries in the state.
Dr. Powell has given permission to use and forward the paper as needed.
This message includes:
Protect Your Family from EMF Pollution - EMF Analysis
"Thus far in 2015, I have been contacted by multiple people who have reported being injured by the new Xfinity WiFi routers. One woman wrote that it felt like she was "being microwaved." Others have reported headaches, insomnia, brain fog, burning sensations on their skin and heart arrhythmia.
"In this article I explain likely reasons why people are experiencing symptoms in response to Xfinity and also provide some solutions to this problem. . . .
Update includes original posting from April 7, 2015
It has been some time since we sent an update about the class action lawsuit in April. There has been no change at all since then. Class action law suits take a long time normally, and this is especially so when one side has money and resources without end. The initial schedule called for Hydro to have 5 days to present evidence, which is very unusual in the initial certification phase. The judge set aside 5 days in April but unexpectedly her schedule was revised and she was unable to accommodate this much time. Now the hearing is set for December. Our lawyer has completed all of the necessary work and all we can do now is wait until December. If there is any change, we will let you know immediately.
" . . . Direction 4 allowed opt out choice ONLY for residential customers who had thus far managed to avoid the installation of a microwave smart meter up until December 1, 2013. No commercial customers were allowed an opt out choice.
"After more than 2 years of forced installations, and two months after commencement of this legal action against BC Hydro, the Liberals used Direction 4 to deny opt out choice for 96% of BC Hydro customers, allowing opt out choice ONLY for those customers who had successfully refused a smart meter of any kind up to December 1, 2013. Out of 1.8 million customers, only 4% were deemed eligible for choice. Direction 4 only allowed customers to opt out if they had residential accounts (no business), and no RF smart meter had yet been installed by December 1, 2013. In short, Direction 4 closed any loopholes left out of the Clean Energy Act and determined the different ways in which individual customers may suffer under the heavy hand of BC Hydro's smart meter rollout.
"It was an amazing moment to realize the Liberals had imposed an act which made legal severe restriction of civil liberties without any kind of parliamentary discussion. . . .
Links to Participation Forms, Q and A and other information for anyone opposed to BC Hydro's Smart Meter Program
* Check out the postings under BCUC/BC Hydro Class Action / BCUC on this website for ongoing news and updates.
COMPLETE THIS FORM TO PARTICIPATE:
Questions and Answers relating to Participation Forms
Opt-Out Sign for Analog (Option 1)
Opt-out Sign for Analog (Option 2- Class Action Version)
TAKE ACTION IN YOUR COMMUNITY:
McArthur of Talk Radio AM640 interviews Veronica Onyskiw whose home was burned by an exploding smart meter (June 4th 2015)
A Collingwood family woke up this weekend to an explosive sound which turned out to be their smart meter which had become a "ball of fire" attached to the side of their house. "The meter is about three feet from the main gas line into the house. If that wall had gone and then the car parked right beside it would've been very, very bad."
Despite thousands of smart meters that were supposed to be removed because their structure was similar to some found in Sask. which were implicated in several fires, Veronica Onyskiw's was not considered a threat. She joins us to discuss what happened that day and what the province is doing about smart meters going forward.
Interview with Sharon Noble - August 7, 2015
The focus of this interview on The Goddard Report is fires as they relate to Itron "smart" meters.
At the 7'30" mark, reference to the Class Action against B.C. Hydro clarifies the time of the upcoming Court date for the judge to accept or reject CSTS's application for certification. Currently the date is set for December, 2015, but these targets keep changing. Time will tell. Your support and donations continue to be highly valuable, and any contributions you can make would be appreciated.
Are Smart Meters pumping out a lot more radiation than government admits?
Guest's website: http://www.stopsmartmetersbc.com/
Canadian Federal Election Day Reminder: October 19th, 2015
Bill Henderson performs his new song "Take Back This Land"; Salt Spring Island, July 2015.
Link to Take Back This Land sung in natural surroundings on Salt Spring Island
Pre-release recording session for Take Back this Land (August 2nd, 2015, still in draft form):
190 Scientists from around the world are sounding the alarm as they appeal to the U.N. and the World Health Organization to take action to safeguard people and animals from the negative health effects from wireless technology.
Create a Mechanism for Canadians to Report Adverse Reactions to Wireless Radiation
"The Standing Committee of Health (2010) report . . . obtained recommended that:
"Health Canada ensure that it has a process in place to receive and respond to reports of adverse reactions to electromagnetic radiation emitting devices.
"In this document obtained by C4ST under the Access to Information Act, the memo from Health Canada to the Minister of Health states: "HC does not support the recommendation to establish an adverse reaction reporting process specifically for RF exposures."
"Help us encourage Health Minister Ambrose to follow the Parliamentary Committee recommendations by gathering signatures on the below petition to be presented in the House of Commons.
Wireless Radiation Reporting - House of Commons Sitting 209 (English)
Published on 22 Jun 2015
New York Times on same side as Industry in the radiation debate
"The lead paragraph of the New York Times article published today, "Cellphone Ordinance Puts Berkeley at Forefront of Radiation Debate," reveals the paper's bias:
"Leave it to Berkeley: This city, which has led the nation in passing all manner of laws favored by the left, has done it again. This time, the city passed a measure -- not actually backed by science -- requiring cellphone stores to warn customers that the products could be hazardous to their health, presumably by emitting dangerous levels of cancer-causing radiation." The article overlooks the fact that the Berkeley ordinance is simply a consumer disclosure law which brings to the consumer's attention safety information that the Federal Communications Commission requires cell phone manufacturers provide to consumers. Few consumers ever see these warnings because manufacturers hide them in the user manual or in some instances in the smart phone.
"Despite the article's allegation, Berkeley is not the first city to adopt a cell phone "right to know" law. The Berkeley ordinance is more conservative than the cell phone "right to know" ordinance that San Francisco adopted in 2010.
"The Berkeley ordinance was written by Harvard Law Professor Lawrence Lessig and Yale Law Professor and Dean Robert Post to withstand legal challenges from the CTIA--The Wireless Association because this industry association threatened the City with a law suit even before the ordinance was drafted.
"San Francisco adopted a more far-reaching ordinance in 2010. The San Francisco ordinance required cell phone retailers to issue a fact sheet that mentions potential cancer-causing radiation from exposure to cell phone radiation. In contrast, the Berkeley safety notice does not mention cancer or any other health effects.
"The San Francisco ordinance was adopted on a 10-1 vote by the Board of Supervisors. Mayor Gavin Newsom, now the Lieutenant Governor of California, "called the vote a major victory for cell phone shoppers' right to know."
"When the CTIA-The Wireless Association sued challenging the constitutionality of the ordinance, Deputy City Attorney Vince Chhabria represented the City of San Francisco. Mr. Chhabria, now a Federal District Judge, strongly believed that the ordinance was constitutional.
"The case was heard by Federal District Judge William Alsup. Judge Alsup ruled that the ordinance was intrusive as it required cell phone retailers to label cell phones, post a warning in their stores, and provide consumers with a fact sheet. However, the Judge decided it was legal to require cell phone retailers to provide customers with a fact sheet as long as the facts were not controversial.
"Judge Alsup negotiated with lawyers from the CTIA and the City of San Francisco about the language for a revised fact sheet. . .
"Following is the language from the revised fact sheet which the Judge approved: . . .
One time donation: Click the donate button below and follow the instructions on the screen.
Monthly donation: If you wish to contribute every month, please select the amount from the Donation Options list below and click Subscribe. Your contribution will be sent for you every month for the amount you selected.
Citizens for Safe Technology (CST) is funded and supported solely by those who wish to help us. Thank-you for learning, sharing and helping if you can.
Meetings and events on the issue of wireless technologies in homes and communities throughout North America.
Click the button above to sign our online petition to return to hardwired computers in schools.
Click the button above to sign our online petition against Smart Meters in British Columbia.
Citizens For Safe Technology
"Wi-Fi: Is It Safe?"
Citizens for Safe Technology is a not-for-profit educational society made up of parents, grandparents, teachers, business professionals, scientists, politicians and lawyers concerned about the exponential increase in public exposure to harmful wireless technologies.
We believe a profound urgency exists to protect the unsuspecting public, especially children, youth and pregnant mothers from unsafe wireless technologies.
The content of the Citizens for Safe Technology website is provided for information purposes only. Information is subject to change without prior notice. Every effort has been taken to ensure that the information on this website is accurate, but no guarantees can be made.
Neither Citizens for Safe Technology nor its authors are liable for damages resulting from the use of information obtained from this site. The authors are not responsible for any contents linked or referred to from this website or any damages resulting from information on those sites.
The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the information on this site lies with the reader.