Citizens for Safe Technology
Empowering the public to protect children
and nature from unsafe wireless technologies.

Insurance and Liability
As insight and concern surrounding the health impacts of wireless technologies grow, so does the issue of liability. Is the rapid deployment of this untested technology a short sighted and potentially dangerous course? Increasingly, industries and businesses are taking steps to protect themselves from the legal implications of promoting wireless technology without informing the public of possible dangers.
As a result of advertising and incentives, communities are welcoming and adopting an ever-growing array of wireless devices and infrastructure. Schools and libraries, churches, hospitals, care facilities, community centres, sports facilities and entertainment venues, airports, public transportation systems, public thoroughfares, shopping malls, cafes and coffee houses, restaurants . . . almost all public places are inundated with opportunities to install wireless devices for public convenience and enjoyment.
As science emerges that confirms the long-term, non-thermal, biological effects of wireless technologies, will it be incumbent upon industry, business and governments to inform a trusting and uninformed population?
Looking for a specific topic or a past article? Search for it below:
Meters that Endanger: Shocking Details from a Whistleblower
news and links
"Are smart meters just too complex? Are they veritable blackboxes (well, beige) of assorted electronic components, jury-rigged and thrown together in an off-shore factory, and then slapped onto houses without proper safety testing? Sure, we all have electronic devices in the home, but through this particular device passes all the electrical current for the house. That's a set-up asking for trouble . . .
Wi-Fi in schools: Plaintiffs' Response (2 of 7)
Morrison v. Portland Public Schools - Defendant: Portland Oregon Public Schools US District Court
Pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, AHM and David Mark
Morrison (Plaintiffs) state their responses and objections to Defendant's First Set of
Interrogatories as follows:
General Objections
Responses and Objections
Wi-Fi in Schools: Declaration of Lloyd Morgan (6 of 7)
Defendant: Portland Oregon Public Schools US District Court Amended December 22, 2011
"I, Lloyd Morgan, under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746, hereby make the
following declaration in support of a preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining Portland
Public Schools' use of Wi-Fi . . .
"
13. Portland Public Schools' use of Wi-Fi is causing and will continue to cause Alexandra Morrison, other students, and school staff and faculty adverse health effects and should be discontinued immediately . . ."
Wi-Fi in Schools: Memorandum in Support of Preliminary Injunction Motion (3 of 7)
Morrison v. Portland Public Schools - Defendant: Portland Oregon Public Schools US District Court
"Alexandra Helen Morrison and David Mark Morrison offer the following Memorandum
in support of their Motion for Preliminary Injunction as their fundamental rights are violated by
Portland Public Schools' policy of educating via the internet by use of WI-FI.
"This case will establish that a child's fundamental rights and liberties to a life and health
free from ill health and disease, and a parent's fundamental rights and liberties to the
care and control of his child's health and continuing well-being are violated by
Portland Public Schools' policy of educating via the internet by way of WI-FI and must be
permanently enjoined as it is not narrowly tailored to a compelling governmental interest . . ."
Wi-Fi in Schools: Declaration of Barrie Trower (7 of 7)
Morrison v. Portland Public Schools - Defendant: Portland Oregon Public Schools US District Court - Amended December 21, 2011
". . . Within the relevant scientific community it is generally accepted that many bioeffects
and adverse health effects occur at far lower levels of radiofrequency exposure where no
measurable heating occurs; some effects are shown to occur at several hundred thousand times
below the existing public safety limits.
In my opinion, Portland Public Schools' use of WI-FI is causing and will continue to cause
Alexandra Morrison, other students, and school staff and faculty adverse health effects and should
be discontinued immediately."
Wi-Fi in Schools: Declaration of David O. Carpenter M.D. (5 of 7)
Defendant: Portland Oregon Public Schools US District Court - Amended December 20, 2011
". . . The evidence for adverse effects of radiofrequency radiation is currently strong
(beyond just a known controversy) and grows stronger with each new study. Educating by way of
the internet via cabled systems does not increase exposure.
"Based on a high degree of medical certainty, Portland Public Schools' use of WI-FI
is causing and will continue to cause Alexandra Morrison, other students, and school staff and
faculty adverse health effects and should be discontinued immediately."
Wi-Fi in Schools: Declaration of Curtis Bennett (4 of 7)
Defendant: Portland Oregon Public Schools US District Court Amended December 19, 2011
" . . . In my opinion as a professional with Canadian national and provincial credentials, Portland Public Schools' use of WI-FI is causing and will continue to cause Alexandra Morrison, other students, and school staff and faculty adverse health effects and should be discontinued immediately as this as a national and global emergency."
Wi-Fi in Schools: Complaint (1 of 7)
Defendant: Portland Public Schools, United States District Court - June 17, 2011
Complaint for Declaratory, Injunctive of Other Relief:
Introduction, Jurisdiction and Venue, Nature of Dispute, Facts, Claims for Relief, Irreparable Injury, Prayer, Demand for Jury Trial
Replacing A Smart Meter With A Safe Analog Meter (U.S.)
Addressed to Americans. Canadians pay attention . . .
This video demonstrates a way to protect your home from EMF pollution and unlawful surveillance.
"Smart Meters" have been misrepresented as safe and lawful. They have not been shown to be either, and they are known to be otherwise.
Smart Meters emit dangerous pulsed EMF radiation (a class 2b carcinogen) into private property, and they are instruments of surveillance as defined by Federal Wiretapping Law because Smart Meters monitor personal activities by electronic means inside private homes and businesses.
Power companies, local governments and regulators have badly failed to investigate and confirm the legality and safety of Smart Meters, preferring instead to take the advice and directions of "experts" and "stakeholders" who stand to make billions on this destructive and invasive technology.
Never before has such a poorly conceived and dubious program been undertaken against, ultimately, every person on the planet who receives distributed electrical service.
The dangers to the public are so obvious that to be a proponent of Smart Meters is to be suspect of intentional wrongdoing or severe ignorance.
There will soon be massive backlash against not just Smart Meters but the wider attitude by wealthy elites that they may invade, control and exploit people's private lives as they wish.
People are awakening to these frauds at an accelerating pace. This video is just one tiny part of that general public awakening.
Today, it may seem radical to refuse or reject a Smart Meter on your home. Soon, most of us will have difficulty understanding how a program as unwise and offensive the Smart Meter program could have been contemplated in the first place.
Never support or vote for any electoral candidate who does not openly oppose Smart Meters.
You may have a Smart Meter on your house, and you may have thought it was harmless. The more you learn about these devices the more you will change your mind.
The good news: It is not your fault that you have been deceived. It is never too late to get rid of your Smart Meter.
Canadian Corollary to the Just Cause Clause
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
CANADIAN COROLLARY TO THE JUST CAUSE CLAUSE
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
PART I OF THE CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982 Section 7.
'Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.'
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/charter/
Legal Rights
Life, liberty and security of person
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
Table of ContentsCanadian Charter of Rights and FreedomsPART I OF THE CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982Assented to March 29th, 1982
1. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
2.
1. PART I : CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS
2.
1. 1 - Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms
2. 2 - Fundamental Freedoms
3. 3 - Democratic Rights
4. 6 - Mobility Rights
5. 7 - Legal Rights
6. 15 - Equality Rights
7. 16 - Official Languages of Canada
8. 23 - Minority Language Educational Rights
9. 24 - Enforcement
10. 25 - General
11. 32 - Application of Charter
12. 34 - Citation
One time donation: Click the donate button below and follow the instructions on the screen.
Monthly donation: If you wish to contribute every month, please select the amount from the Donation Options list below and click Subscribe. Your contribution will be sent for you every month for the amount you selected.
Citizens for Safe Technology (CST) is funded and supported solely by those who wish to help us. Thank-you for learning, sharing and helping if you can.
Meetings and events on the issue of wireless technologies in homes and communities throughout North America.
Click the button above to sign our online petition to return to hardwired computers in schools.
Click the button above to sign our online petition against Smart Meters in British Columbia.
Download and print this petition form -- Refuse Smart Meter Installation.
Send completed petitions 15 signatures per page to:
Una St. Clair
fax:
1-866-824-8865
e-mail: una@citizensforsafetechnology.org
Download Brochure

Citizens For Safe Technology
"Wi-Fi: Is It Safe?"
About CST
Citizens for Safe Technology is a not-for-profit educational society made up of parents, grandparents, teachers, business professionals, scientists, politicians and lawyers concerned about the exponential increase in public exposure to harmful wireless technologies.
We believe a profound urgency exists to protect the unsuspecting public, especially children, youth and pregnant mothers from unsafe wireless technologies.
Disclaimer
The content of the Citizens for Safe Technology website is provided for information purposes only. Information is subject to change without prior notice. Every effort has been taken to ensure that the information on this website is accurate, but no guarantees can be made.
Neither Citizens for Safe Technology nor its authors are liable for damages resulting from the use of information obtained from this site. The authors are not responsible for any contents linked or referred to from this website or any damages resulting from information on those sites.
The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the information on this site lies with the reader.